THE LAKE HOUSE
by Robert A. Nowotny
There's a chance you will find THE LAKE HOUSE laughingly
awful, thanks to poorly written lines and Keanu's delivery of
the world's least convincing sneeze.—Matthew Turner,
VIEWLONDON
Mr. Turner is being kind.
Keanu Reeves and Sandra Bullock purportedly fall in love with
one another in what is undoubtedly one of the dumbest movies to
come down the pike in years. The main connection between the two
lead actors is that they both either live in or have previously
lived in the same lake house—a ghastly glass edifice of
maybe 800 square feet that sits on stilts along the bank of a
large pond somewhere outside of Chicago. What the art director
attempts to pass off as an architectural gem is nothing more than
a well-worn, waterfront collection of windows. Pass the Windex,
please.
The major problem facing our protagonists is that Bullock is
living in the year 2006 and Reeves is living in the year 2004.
Thankfully, the U.S. Post Office is somehow able to deliver mail
back and forth to one another at supersonic speed. In fact, each
time a letter magically arrives the flag on the dilapidated
mailbox gets an erection that Bob Dole would be proud of. This
signals, of course, that yet another letter has found its way over
two years of separation. It's truly amazing what our proud postal
workers are able to achieve; take that, Internet…
Of course, this doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
The primary culprit in this cinematic catastrophe is
screenwriter David Auburn. Mr. Auburn is the Pulitzer
Prize-winning author of “PROOF” which, among
other accolades, also received the Tony Award for the
“Best Play” on Broadway in 2001. Despite these
impressive credentials, his adaptation of a South Korean film
(SIWORAE) gets totally lost in the translation. My advice is for
Mr. Auburn to stick to the Great White Way and never, ever attempt
a screenplay again.
In the final analysis, THE LAKE HOUSE simply doesn't make any
sense. In fact, the entire screenplay is full of more holes than a
wino's Fruit-of-the-Looms. And the intended touchy-feely
existential romance between Reeves and Bullock never materializes;
there is absoultely no chemistry or passion between them. Topo
Gigo and Trish Putterman would be more engaging to watch.
|